Until the oil seals go and you need a new engine as happened to Dave AKA Jack in a Boxneilc said:If a Boxster is what you want then get a 3.2 S , much more low down urge than the 2.7. To be fair they are both a great daily driver but come winter the TT will be the better car thats for sure.
Well if your body is in proportion to your feet, then guess your melon would be about 2 foot above the windscreen too, whilst not being too bad in the summer, with the roof up............................Bikerz said:Blown out of water! 987 pedals too close together for my size 15's and I wont have a auto!
I am surprised at the S2000, I found them very tiny inside and no width at all... MX5 defo out :lol:Bikerz said:6 foot 4, size 15. Slim tho 11.5 - 14.5 stone.
TT is fine, SLK fine, Saab Fine, S2k Fine!
Boxster, Z4, MX5 all out!
Im all Leg mate 34" leg. Width???? Im a skinny runt as as most on here will tell you ........ Just with Yeti feet :lol:Blade_76 said:I am surprised at the S2000, I found them very tiny inside and no width at all... MX5 defo out :lol:Bikerz said:6 foot 4, size 15. Slim tho 11.5 - 14.5 stone.
TT is fine, SLK fine, Saab Fine, S2k Fine!
Boxster, Z4, MX5 all out!
You aint 6 foot 4 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:Bikerz said:Im all Leg mate 34" leg. Width???? Im a skinny runt as as most on here will tell you ........ Just with Yeti feet :lol:Blade_76 said:I am surprised at the S2000, I found them very tiny inside and no width at all... MX5 defo out :lol:Bikerz said:6 foot 4, size 15. Slim tho 11.5 - 14.5 stone.
TT is fine, SLK fine, Saab Fine, S2k Fine!
Boxster, Z4, MX5 all out!
I think you should try driving a Porsche through those twisties. Take it from me, my old 996 would take corners with more confidence than my TT ever could. It had no TC and no stability control and I honestly have no idea what it would take to make it misbehave, because on a dry road it was stuck to it like glue.Demessiah said:I know when I hit the twisties against a faster rear engined car Im going to win. I have 100% confidence and they will be to worried to push it as hard as me.
Unless the rear brakes free, then its big drama.Spandex said:No drama.
Errrr I beg to differ , having very recently driven a 997 Carrera S 2wd in moist conditions.TERRIFYING is the word I would use. Fair enough I was not holding back and used the opportunity to see what it was like in the wet but a 4wd RS4 / RS6 / TTRS would leave it for dead. Sorry but thats a fact and before you say it I have driven and owned lots of RWD cars so do know how to handle a mobile rear end.Spandex said:The days of the 'widow maker' 911s are long gone. They don't suddenly snap the back end round just because you pushed a little too hard. I think you might be kidding yourself if you think a modern 911 does anything other than inspire confidence in the corners.
Missed the bit about the dry. Just found it twitchy and a little bit to keen to lose grip without warning for my liking. But not disputing its a great car and fantastic value for money at the moment.Spandex said:Yeah, I did actually say "on a dry road".
I'm not arguing about what is or isn't faster (after all, there are plenty of faster cars on the road) I'm pointing out that a 911 isn't a scary car to drive hard. You may have been out in one for a bit, but I've owned and driven one all year round in all conditions, including snow.
I think the word terrifying is rather biggin it up a bit. Of course the C2S does not have the outright grip of a 4wd, not exactly telling the world something we do not know, but terrifying...come on please, either the C2S had something wrong with it or you were totally overdriving the car for the conditions...our 996 C2 feels composed in wet conditions but obviously will bite if overdriven, as it is controlled by the laws of physics like any car is, you need to live with a car for a while and drive it in all conditions to get under it's skin and get the best from it, and there is a lot of pleasure out of a fast drive in tough conditions knowing that you controlled the car rather than it controlling you. Hmmm...... 997 C2S or RS whatever, personally I know where I would rather sit, faster or not.neilc said:Errrr I beg to differ , having very recently driven a 997 Carrera S 2wd in moist conditions.TERRIFYING is the word I would use. Fair enough I was not holding back and used the opportunity to see what it was like in the wet but a 4wd RS4 / RS6 / TTRS would leave it for dead. Sorry but thats a fact and before you say it I have driven and owned lots of RWD cars so do know how to handle a mobile rear end.Spandex said:The days of the 'widow maker' 911s are long gone. They don't suddenly snap the back end round just because you pushed a little too hard. I think you might be kidding yourself if you think a modern 911 does anything other than inspire confidence in the corners.