As I understand it - Audi put a spare-wheel cut-out in the TT at the design stage as it was assumed that a space-saver would be standard. However, crash tests showed that no matter how the space-saver was held in, it still created a danger. Because Audi was now aware of the danger, they could not offer a spare otherwise they would lose every court case.
Yes, if you put a spare wheel, or luggage in the boot, or carry a loose anvil, then that is a danger too - but then you did that, not Audi.
In another thread, perhaps the one that's now missing, the question of the circumference of the spare was discussed. Obviously, if you have 20" wheels and a 16" spare, you are going to get problems with the differential - more so with quattro versions - as the car, even on a straight road, will believe that it is going round in tight circles.
As there is the possibility of 17", 18",19" and 20" wheels - for safety and engineering purposes the SSST might have to be offered in a range of sizes,
The circumference of the wheel/tyre assembly is not obvious - an 18" SS tyre will have a deeper wall than the low-profile fitted to 19/20" wheels and the circumference of the18" SS may not be that much different. (I seem to remember that a 5 stud Jaguar 18" SSST was all but the same as a 19 x 255 x 35 - I think the same applies to a golf SSST but I wouldn't swear to it.
On FWD models, if the spare is on the back, it doesn't matter what the circumference is (although braking on that axle may be affected.) Thus the solution here is to carry a SSspare that fits in the well and if the puncture is at the front, swap the puncture with a good rear tyre and place the SS spare on the rear.